History: Software_Project

• «
• »

            A __software project__ profile is a high priority as it could help attract programmers to our project.

As an example, let's look at the [http://openmoko.org|Open Moko project], which uses several applications to manage its community.

# [http://www.mediawiki.org/|MediaWiki] for the main site
# Not [http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/|one] but [http://admin-trac.openmoko.org/trac|two] instances of [http://trac.edgewall.org/|Trac] for bug tracking, and more (they migrated from [http://www.bugzilla.org/|Bugzilla])
# [http://www.planetplanet.org/|Planet] for RSS aggregation
# [http://gforge.org/|Gforge] for project management
# [http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/|Mailman] for the mailing lists/forums

They appear to have used the "best of breed" strategy when picking applications. More about this at [http://marclaporte.com/TikiSucks]

However, now, it must be quite a challenge to integrate these various applications. Pretty much all this functionality could have been handled by a single all-in-one application like TikiWiki or with a framework/CMS with additional modules (like Drupal, Joomla!, Plone, Xoops, etc).

The following profile is to meet this use case. Open Moko is a fairly large project though so let's keep in mind that most projects are much smaller. 

In using TikiWiki instead of the above combination:

__The "bad"__
*not everything is done exactly the same.
**Tiki forums are not the same as mailman mailing lists, and Open Moko wiki cleverly notes [http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Discussion_Forums#Why_aren.27t_there_Web_forums.3F|that "Apparently, there are two groups of people: one group does not like Web forums; the other group prefers Web forums"] so we should set-up the ((doc:Forum and List Synchronization))
**Project management would be the TikiWiki way and not the [http://gforge.org/|gforge] way.
*not all features are necesarily as advanced.
*Some feature are just missing.
**[http://dev.tikiwiki.org/wish1995|TikiWiki doesn't offer the svn browser feature that Trac does].

__The "good"__
*Tiki does have features that they may want.
**For example, blogs and news articles. It would be even worse if they installed a [http://wordpress.org/|WordPress] blog on top of what they have.
**Surveys
**Etc.
*Tiki would offer 
**Single Sign On (single user system, groups & permissions)
**Global search engine
**Consistent look & feel
*Tighter integration permits better internal linking


In this profile, we need 
*Wiki
*Forums
**((doc:Forum and Mailing List Synchronization))
*Improve the ((Bug_Tracker)) profile
*RSS aggregator
*Categories
*((dev:Source browser)) 
*etc

Things we should improve to make Tiki an even more compelling software collaboration tool:
*http://blog.lphuberdeau.com/wordpress/2009/01/25/adding-collaboration-and-durability-to-code-reviews/


We'll start below

!!Features & settings
{CODE(caption=>YAML)}
preferences:
 feature_articles : y
 feature_file_galleries : y
 feature_forums : y
 feature_trackers : y
 feature_categories : y
 feature_search : y
 feature_minichat: y
 feature_wiki : y
 feature_wiki_print : y
 feature_wiki_attachments: y
 feature_wiki_comments: y
 feature_backlinks: y
 style: coelesce.css
 feature_useGroupHome : y
 allowRegister : y
 forgotPass : y
 feature_userPreferences : y
 wiki_edit_plugin: y
{CODE}




!Permissions
Uses: ((Community_Permissions))

{CODE(caption=>YAML)}
dependencies:
 - $profiles.tikiwiki.org:Community_Permissions:Community_Permissions
 - $profiles.tikiwiki.org:Bug_Tracker:bug_tracker
{CODE}


! Modules
{CODE(caption=>YAML)}
objects:
 -
  type: module
  ref: module_minichat
  data:
   name: minichat
   groups: [ Anonymous, Registered ]
   position: right
   order: 2
{CODE}

        

• «
• 1 (current)
• 2
• 3
• »